2026-11-01 21:55 UTC
Replies (19)
-
@altphoto@lemmy.today 2026-11-02 01:04
To enjoy all the money he has stolen so far he would need to spend like a million dollars per day based on how he looks closer to the other side. So why even get more money? Why continue making others miserable?
-
@a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 00:31
We could make him Mr. Impeached.
-
@aesthelete@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 03:04
Can he spell veto though?
-
@frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 2026-11-01 22:39
Bring on the government shutdowns
-
@cattywampas@lemmy.world 2026-11-01 22:05
Two years of a lame duck presidency would be a breath of fresh air after the last two.
-
@Bwaz@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:36
better thsn him getting the absolute horsecrap to sign that he has signed.
-
@Denfa@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:38
He’s at the dementia stage where he signs anything when a pen is handed to him. He’s not making his own decisions any longer.
-
@Denfa@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 04:39
I think we can make this work: Do not not release the Epstein files
-
@Heikki2@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 05:12
Build the record of all the Trump Likes bill 1 though 1000 gtr vetoed by this L4D boomer himself
-
@SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2026-11-02 05:18
I think that governors and presidents alike shouldn’t have direct veto power. Their job is to enact the will of congress and the people. If veto is retained in a future America, I suggest the following: 1: The leader nominates an congressionally approved law for being vetoed. 2: A 30 day window opens, where voters can send in a ballot to approve the veto. 51% of the ballots have to agree with the veto to cancel the incoming law. 3: Voters can mark on their ballot whether to automatically prevent the leader from being able to nominate laws for veto. If 51% of the cast ballots agree to lame the leader, that leader loses veto power for the rest of their term. 4: If a lamed leader is voted into office for another term, a ballot is sent out to voters. They will decide whether to restore veto powers to that leader. 51% of cast ballots have to agree to do the restoration. A leader has to risk losing their veto privilege when exercising it, especially if it becomes a cudgel of choice for them.
-
@ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2026-11-02 05:25
If I threatened to my boss that I would just not do my job if I didn’t get what I wanted, I’d probably be fired on the spot, but to each their own I guess.
-
@pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-02 06:14
Tf is that supposed to mean? Another j6?
-
@D_C@sh.itjust.works 2026-11-02 06:20
That’s one way to go. How about going the PresiDunce Assassinated route? Or even better the PresiDunce Untreatable Cancer that’s amazingly PAINFUL but suffered over years route?
-
@Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 06:30
Cool, And we’ll start hunting untill you can’t.
-
@WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2026-11-02 06:31
High cholesterol says it will make Donny “Mr Deado”
-
@heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2026-11-02 06:42
Unless we 25A him out and get someone who’ll do his job, eh?
-
@CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 2026-11-02 07:41
Believe it or not, that’s the ideal outcome short of impeachment. The economy is fucked. An obstructionist Trump lets Dems continue to rightly blame him for it, and Republicans with any luck take it on the chin again in 2028.
-
@OwOarchist@pawb.social 2026-11-02 03:07
Still better than being Mr Tariff and Mr Pedo. Tell him his terms are acceptable.
-
@Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-03 03:21
We kno