2026-04-24 17:30 UTC
@snacks@netzsphaere.xyz I'm guessing it'd be that they are only ever making up plausible sentences, there's no knowledge and no model of what you are asking for, therefore it's not meaningful to have it stop when it needs clarification. @ceo_of_monoeye_dating@tsundere.love would know more
and unless LLM transformer models are substantially different from MLPs and CNNs which I know of, there's nothing that links output to the source, so it's not referencing information from its training data
Replies (2)
-
@snacks@netzsphaere.xyz 2026-04-24 17:33
@protos@tsundere.love @ceo_of_monoeye_dating@tsundere.love It seems they can't, if you do something like rag they can easily differenciate context from their internal bs at least
-
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@tsundere.love 2026-04-24 18:13
@protos@tsundere.love @snacks@netzsphaere.xyz >LLM transformer models are substantially different from MLPs and CNNs They are, and pinging the Computer Vision expert about LLMs is a bit of a bad move. Regardless, I'll look at this thread and see if the underlying issue is one that I can answer.