You had to do research for that?

It wouldn’t be much different even for billionaires under 90

in other news, grass is green

I’m fine with taxing the ever-loving shit out of their estates. If the heir class are not fine with that, we can go to OP’s suggestion.

1/2 of all the rich are rich because they were born rich. I lost where I found that statistic though.

A suggestion for lunch, perhaps?

Outlaw billionaires, tax them out of existence, and use the proceeds to fund needed social programs like medical care for all and universal basic income. They can still be richer than 99% of us as multimillionaires, and the more wealth these elites create, the better our society becomes through the tax sequestration - it’s a win win.

Article: theguardian.com/…/all-billionaires-under-30-have-…

It’s an olive branch, but yeah I hear you.

It’s against most rules for advocating against certain things, however for educational purposes only I would suggest a slow roast with a barbeque glaze, and if you’d like to put in some effort an apple and sage stuffing could really help bring some flavours out (be sure to remove that giant stick they all have up their arse first, though).

The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero. Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal. Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

No shit. And all them have had funds and investments made in their names the moment they were born.

It still weird me out that there are only something like 600 billionaires in the US. This seems like such a solvable problem.

Larger Estate Tax.

How do you talk the winner of a Monopoly game into not playing the game anymore and letting us move onto a cooperative game? Like my god man, Monopoly isn’t even that good of a game; we all know by now it was created to lampoon capitalism. The game sucks. Stop touting your winnings. You are ruining game night with this! And now you’re having your kids brag about your winnings and holding game night hostage? Bruh.

not that bs 1% or 2%, at least 50%

It’s not just this, we need to end all means of them living off borrowed debt. If you own that much money, there is no reason to be borrowing anything from anyone you have more money than

I wonder what the suggestion may be.

As such they should be excluded from any kind of political interaction

The system we created ensured the wealth is concentrated among a few of us, has always been this way even when monarchs ruled a majority of our population.

1 million a year is ridiculous, you can already accumulate wealth if you have that much. And that defeats it already. What you want is an equitable society, in where social ownership is the norm. Credit unions, time banks, for example. I think it’s much more sane to have a max of what ordinary salaries in worker-owned co-ops top out at. A manager at for example Mondragon, a federation of worker-owned co-ops, may earn no more than five times the minimum of their own workers. Assuming you’d need €40,000 a year in the poorest US states as a living wage, that yields €200,000 a year there. In Vietnam, this would be about €4,750 a year., and thus € 23,750 for the richest. In Switzerland, that might be €60,000 a year and therefore €300,000. The issue with money is also, it can be accumulable, and inherently fosters inequality. Time banks might be an alternative, but they ultimately rend into wage labour by a different name. An idea might be a form of decentralised Community Exchange System, which is essentially a mutual aid system that fosters to give-it-forward (and thus to share).

Sure, I have some wood ready here.

*Warning: values may change over time due to societal shifts or manipulation of public consensus. Batteries sold separately

Their parents created so much value for humanity that it overflows to their children. (capitalist ideologues really believe this)